The Breakthrough: Online Journalism

President Franklin Delano Roosevelt prohibited...

President Franklin Delano Roosevelt prohibited racial discrimination in the military. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

The way America communicates with each other and the rest of the world has in the past met with significant challenges from earlier beginnings of the printing press which issued a record number of propaganda to England on grievous matters; as well as, gathering together those minds who think expressively alike on issues of the heart.

Publick Occurrences, Both Foreign and Domestic,” America’s first newspaper was the vehicle to get that done. Brown says, “Publick Occurrences was brought to an end after only one issue by an outraged administration, claiming that it contained “reflections of a very high order.” It was printed without authority. An aroused bureaucracy issued a broadside warning against future publications of any kind without “licence [sic] first obtained from those appointed by the Government to grant the same.” (Brown, n.d.).

America has most certainly come a long way from nothing to say to have much to say about everything. People of the world speak out about the happenings in life around them. Notably so, are those in charge of citizenry; such as the President of the United States where the most remarkable speeches come from those men who want people to live in harmony. President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, whose “fireside chats” via radio changed American politics. He talked to American citizens about the “New Deal” and America citizens listened. (Eisenhower, n.d. Para. 2).

American citizens read, they speak out and they watch. Most noted in America is the assassination of President John F. Kennedy where America sit in front of their television sets in horror and shock, and where one reporter notes, “In the new world of communications there was no time for any such babying of the emotions, no time to collect oneself, no time for anything except to sit transfixed before the set and try to bring into reality this monstrous, unthinkable thing. Because the word was not only instantaneous but visual, and because at no time did the television reporters know any more than the viewers did, 180,000,000 were forced to live the experience not just hour to hour, or minute to minute, but quite literally from second to second, even as the reporters themselves did. According to Nielsen statistics, a point was reached during the funeral on Monday afternoon when 41,553,000 sets were in use, believed to be an all-time high. For four days the American people were virtual prisoners of an electronic box.” (TV Guide, 1964, Para. 2).

Accordingly, the internet is the world’s breakthrough of the silent citizen held prisoner to the radio, television and newspapers of their countries, because online there is radio, TV, newspaper all rolled into one huge global delivery system. No longer does the world have to sit fixed in front of the radio waiting for a broadcast; nor do they have to wait for the Sunday edition to get more of the news. Thus, the internet brings audio, video, news reporting and writing; and, what the citizens want right to the reader from anywhere in the world.

The audience of the World Wide Web is endless and it has a personality to match. People from all walks of life log on to the internet wherever they are to read the news, play games, and watch videos, read obituaries and to visit their favorite sites.  Rich and poor alike are in it for the ease and comfort of browsing from site to site. Hence, those who read online; especially news, are looking for instant news to fit their busy lifestyles. Gone are the days when people sit on the couch and wait for the news at 5 broadcasts. Life on the run is the name of the game and the internet meets those needs. Craig says, “In the United States the content of commercial media is generally driven by a combination of the medium’s own characteristics and the likes and dislikes of its audience.” (Craig, 2005, p. 9). Thus, there is something to fit everyone’s taste; from science to how-to guides.

The online world of Journalism is far above that of the television in that there are constant updates available for any viewer who chooses to watch or read. Television is great for live broadcast but fails to give minute coverage and updates as is seen with the online news broadcast. Moreover, video clips can be viewed later if the reader has another obligation. It must be noted; however, with the Kennedy assassination viewers sitting riveted to screen also conveys the reality that those at work could not watch. TV Guide reports, “Walter Cronkite, the anchor man of the CBS team, was the first on the air with the bulletin. At 1:30 (EST) when the soap opera, “As the World Turns,” went on live, Cronkite was preparing his regular evening news show, and in every sense the day was an ordinary one, at least judging by the trials and tribulations of the characters in the soap opera. In retrospect, the hero’s sudsy dilemma as to whether or not he should remarry his divorced wife, and his mother’s subsequent conversation with his grandfather about it, seems about as eerily remote as another galaxy. Actress Helen Wagner was just saying, “I gave it a great deal of thought, Grandpa,” when the program was interrupted.” (TV Guide, 1964, Para. 8).

Online activity and reader view allows for anytime view of the news no matter where; however, to be online one must have a computer.  Craig says, “Reading online requires both a computer and internet access. A majority of Americans now have access to computers at home, at work or in the community, but this still weighs on the online audience heavily in favor of those who have computers. When compared with television, which is in more than 98 percent of U.S. households this is a seriously limiting factor.” (Craig, 2005, p. 8).

Live news is always a plus, because no one can dispute whether a source is correct; and neither, does anyone question who said what. Hence, in news reporting the journalist citing sources correctly is critical in the interviewing process. The thing to remember and this is a key point; is that, sources are people with feelings and desires. No one likes reporters for obvious reasons; such as, people are mobbed by them, chased, by them, misquoted by them; also for a number of other reasons.Accordingly, rumors spread across America at the time of Princess Diana’s death where the media was accused of chasing her limousine which resulted in the crash which ended her life. Furthermore, no one has confirmed for sure whether or not this is true to this day. However, this is one reason why when interviewing there should be some kind of resolve on behalf of the reporter to get the words of the source right from the horse’s mouth; preferably, an eye witness. Craig says, “Local reporters are often recognizable figures who can be identified and engaged in conversation on the street and in the grocery store.” (Craig, 2005, p. 65).

A reporter seen as friendly, and one who mingles with the people cannot be viewed as the “evil reporter” who sits behind their desk at the newspaper, nor, as one whose only care is to sell papers; but, can also be viewed as one who knows what the people want. The question every reporter should ask themselves is how I can help if I do not know what the people need? Speculating what the people want does not make for a good story.

Another key point Craig brings out is “who is the person?”  Hence, who is contacting the reporter to give information? Reporters, especially online should be careful to find out. Craig reflects on this when he says, “Does this person have an ax to grind? This is a particular type of ulterior motive. If someone is trying to promote a particular agenda within the company or institution, he is quite likely to slant the information he gives you. This can include trying to make a person look bad, trying to get good press for a possible course of action or helping a crony get good press.” (Craig, 2005, p. 66). The role of the journalist should be as trustworthy as the source, and because of advances via satellite interviews can now be shown live on the web; as well as via television. Technology has indeed come a long way.

President Dwight Eisenhower, affectionately known as Ike was a man who loved the camera, as one journalist notes, “Due to new technological advances, including an improved transatlantic cable, his travels were seen by American audiences. Every night, living rooms in the United States were lit up with images of crowds cheering Eisenhower in England, Scotland, France, West Germany, Italy, Turkey, Greece, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and India. The broadcasts permitted the public to relate directly to the international enthusiasm for Eisenhower, something that was much more difficult to experience by reading news accounts in print. Ike’s travels and TV appearances were so successful that he was named “Man of the Year” in the January 1960 issue of Time. The American public seemed to care less about the mistakes Ike made in the press conferences than they did about the repeated efforts he made to keep them personally informed about the national and international challenges the country was facing in the 1950s. Interestingly, no president since Eisenhower has convened as many broadcasted press conferences.” (Eisenhower, n.d. Para.10).

Broadcast of these travels are a notable accomplishment for the time; however, times have brought rapid growth and change of news reporting and styles. The internet is that change.

In remembrance of the first newspaper which was scrapped after only one issue. Many of the old British set would most probably turn in their graves to see, hear, and read what their kinsmen are writing today. Further, they would most likely be surprised with the measures on which they are getting it done. Way New Journalism has introduced a packaged deal, and Quittner writes, “Imagine what those new journalists could have done with video and sound, with hypertext, and limitless bandwidth.” (Quittner, 1995) (As cited by Craig, 2005, p. 93). Older people are still enthusiastic about the newspaper. There is no technical savvy or know how needed to turn the pages of papers, or linger over a cup of coffee with the morning edition. However, most adults in the work world; especially journalist have made great use of the their time spent reading and gathering stories for those readers who either do not have time for the traditional read, or who just don’t want the bother. Craig says, “The style that emerged had less to do with traditional straight ahead story telling than grabbing the readers and shaking them to attention. It would be witty, irreverent and challenge the reader rather than simply stating facts.” (Craig, 2005, p. 93).

Citizens are becoming increasingly involved in journalism. Traditional journalism, such as is found in print with its fact and data is still valued. However, who tell can tell what goes on in their neighborhood better than those who live there? Hence, straight from the horse’s mouth is really being explained here. Glaser says this, “The idea behind citizen journalism is that people without professional journalism training can use the tools of modern technology and the global distribution of the Internet to create, augment or fact-check media on their own or in collaboration with others. For example, you might write about a city council meeting on your blog or in an online forum. Or you could fact-check a newspaper article from the mainstream media and point out factual errors or bias on your blog. Or you might snap a digital photo of a newsworthy event happening in your town and post it online. Or you might videotape a similar event and post it on a site such as YouTube.” (Glaser, 2006, Para. 1).

People are not taking the media’s word for it anymore, and some even take it a step further to report the news again on the same stories seen in the media. It is not the case that the journalists’ report the news and the people accept what they read as truth. People today; ordinary people, who work, and live near by are reporting the news as they see it. Craig adds further, “Most online news stills bears a strong resemblance to print news, with a few bells and whistles sprinkled in to add a little spice. However, it seems that online news has begun to develop a voice and a style of its own, based largely on characteristics of the medium…any fool can cop and attitude, but the best writing in the “New Way” style often contains solid, factual reporting behind the humor and irreverence.” (Craig, 2005, p. 98).

However great, journalism on the internet has become in reporting the news; whether print or broadcast through television or radio the news gathering and sources should be reliable. Journalists must be considerate of laws as well as adhering to them. Many people have found themselves in court responsible for not only their words, but the action of others. Hence, legal issues are always a concern for the journalist whether on the internet or other vehicles of reporting.

Concerning Participatory Journalism We Media says this: “The venerable profession of journalism finds itself at a rare moment in history where, for the first time, its hegemony as gatekeeper of the news is threatened by not just new technology and competitors but, potentially, by the audience it serves. Armed with easy-to-use Web publishing tools, always-on connections and increasingly powerful mobile devices, the online audience has the means to become an active participant in the creation and dissemination of news and information.” (Media Center, 2012, Para. 16).

Participants from every walk of life want to have their say and news sites all over the world are giving place for them to say it over the internet. We Media adds, “According to the Pew Internet Project, the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, generated the most traffic to traditional news sites in the history of the Web. Many large news sites buckled under the immense demand and people turned to e-mail, weblogs and forums “as conduits for information, commentary, and action related to 9/11 events.” The response on the Internet gave rise to a new proliferation of “do-it-yourself journalism.” Everything from eyewitness accounts and photo galleries to commentary and personal storytelling emerged to help people collectively grasp the confusion, anger and loss felt in the wake of the tragedy. (Media Center, 2012, Para. 17). Hence, everybody everywhere can be a reporter and tell what they see, think and hear about news happening all over the world.

This breakthrough for the everyday person brings with it many challenges to site owners who want to allow the citizen to have their say, but must be aware of damages and legal issues which can arise if they fail to monitor their guests. One person found this out first hand when he found himself on other end of a court citation. “Stratton Oakmont v. Prodigy (1995).  In this case, claims were made that an anonymous Prodigy user posted defamatory remarks about Stratton Oakmont in their Money Talk forum. In this case a person might ask; why does this make the site owner responsible for their participants’ remarks? The premise here is simple, the owner of the site is responsible for the remarks of those who post if they maintain editorial control and the right to delete defamatory or argumentative posts and content on their site. (as cited by Craig, 2005, p. 239). Thus, site owners should be careful of their responsibilities in the content allowed on their site.

Craig adds, “The internet has operated for more than 30 years, yet legal status of much internet communication is still largely unclear for three reasons: The first is that it’s truly an international network, with no central headquarters in one nation and no organizing authority. Secondly, it has radically changed the nature of intellectual property. Thirdly, the explosion of the web in the last few years has brought an exponential growth of commerce to the Web, with all its accompanying legal issues. Each of these has implications for the journalists.” (Craig, 2005, p. 233). Therefore, the journalist and site owner should be aware of these implications.  Journalists have some protection through shield laws which protects them from having to divulge sources; this however, is true for some states but not all.

Notably, the job of the journalist has taken on more job skills than was seen in the past the journalistic task was simply to sit down at his typewriter and produce the story. Today, the cyber journalist has many tasks and many skills to adapt to the online environment. Craig says, “A reporter works for a news portal, which produces news for a variety of media, including handheld devices, television, computer and print. Walking in he will sit down at his desk, and all around him the video screens are seen here and there throughout the room showing live footage from other online sources. This journalist of now will check to see that there is a photographer to shoot pictures and video standup while accompanying him on his beat. Maybe he considers as he prepares for the task that he will have to shoot raw footage of the event himself; either way he notes, he will have to take his Digital Reporters Notebook. This journalist knows that he cannot wait for help if there is none available he must do it himself; he is confident he can.” (Craig, 2005, P. 263)

Eventually, television, radio, and print news might become second rate in the minds of those who are technologically savvy. No longer or people confined to the television set, the newspaper only, but for many the breakthrough has come, and people receive news on the go. Moreover, the user is transported into other places and other times from work, from home, from anywhere in the world. The job of the online journalist to take them there; definitively, telling the story. People all over the world are interactive and they watch, read, hear, speak out, write and listen to the reported news. On a personal and more reflective note, I cannot imagine not being able to write down what I want to say, think or have learned in life, and neither can I accept another’s reasoning without investing purposeful time to gather my own news. People who have no voice are lost; and, sadly allow opportunities to pass them by. People need to be able to communicate their thoughts, dreams, passions, desires and grievances in whatever manner available to them. Hence, if I want to write I am free to do so, to report I can am free to do so as well. There is something about the ink on paper that penetrates the deepest depths of the mind and soul. Without a doubt freedom is needed to write down our vision, what we see in life, because when there is no hope the people die. (Dailey, K., (2012)


Publick Occurrences, Both foreign and Domestick. 

Eisenhower and the Media, Dwight D. Eisenhower Memorial Commission

Your Guide to Citizen Journalism

We Media, How Audiences are Shaping the Future of News and Information

 America’s Long Vigil 

Online Journalism

Related articles

Good Without God?


A public outrage and cry rang out as people city of Fort Worth, Texas look on in horror and disbelief. Buses pass by bearing a sign of disrespect to the Most High God, and the media had a field day as those who patronizing citizens watched their spiritual leaders gather to boycott in response to the advertisement brandished across public buses that read, “Good without God!” The mockery of which was seemingly a slap in the face for all who call on the name of God; words spewed out from among a local atheist group who say that man can do good, and behave himself in some moral fashion without God who created him.  As a result the eruption of multitudes brought city transportation service to near standstill as patrons chose other forms of going to their destinations.  Television viewers watched drivers refusal to transport passengers on those buses bearing those signs, and with lively-hoods threatened one has wonder how any good can come from man apart from God? The picture man paints as good is but a vain attempt at righteousness which brings forth pandemonium, and this certainly is not good. How can man be good with out God; when God who made man in His image, and fashioned man to be good connected to His spirit? The word of God gives an account of all He made since the beginning: “the day and night, the creeping and crawling things, the birds of the air, the beasts of the field, and male and female created He them, and looking back on all that He had made on the sixth day of the world’s existence He saying, “it is good!” (Genesis 1:1-31, KJV) How is it then that man who is made to be good with God has the audacity to say, “I am good without Him?” An insolent people will say that there is no God, and therefore will say that since there is no God then people can be good without Him. God thought ahead of man and said,   “…the fool, the morally deficient being says in his heart, “there is no God.” They are corrupt, their deeds are vile; there is no one who does good.” (Psalms 14:1, NIV).  Hence, there is not an ability to do right, or good continuously without a relationship with the Most High God who made man in His image.

The skepticism of some has the world on God alert where the mere mention of His name brings forth the question “is it possible for man to be good without belief in God?” This thinking can’t be good, and Nielson says, “some argue that in a Godless world we have no grounds for being persons of goodwill, or doing what is morally required of us” (Nielson, K., 1982, pp. 335, Para 1).  No morals is evident of no God, and a plausible reason why for some there is no will to do right, no caring for neighbors, brothers and certainly no hope. Neilson goes further to say, “it is–rightly or wrongly–widely believed now that no proof can be given of God’s existence and that it is not even the case that we can give evidence or grounds for the claim that it is probable that God exists…trying to do any of these things is frequently thought to be a confusion based of a misconception of the realities of Jewish and Christian belief.” (Nielson, K., 1982, pp. 335, Para 2).

The misconception for non-believers of God is that anything good can come from man’s vain attempts at righteousness without Him; they are sorely lacking which shows forth confusion, aggravation, and frustration in its greatest display.  What does it hurt to believe in a Power greater than oneself when it seems that man’s attempts at goodness have proved shameful to say the least? For a morally deficient man says it is good to steal if their children are hungry, and when caught will use that same pitiful excuse to escape punishment. What does man’s way reveal when so many face hunger daily all over the world; is man really good without God who promises to provide for those who love him?Neilson says, “A morally concerned human being will accept God humbly on faith, for without that faith and the belief in God which it entails, morality. Human integrity, and the basis of our self-respect will be undermined and life will be revealed as an utterly useless passion” (Nielson, K., 1982, pp. 335,336 Para 3).

False gods and other worldly philosophies can be a critical key in a minds turning away from the righteousness and goodness of God, and the seeking after other relationship, and philosophies. The word of God says that man was created in His image so the question comes to mind that asks– how does man not believe in Him, or how can he ignore the evidence of those living things that he sees including himself? Confusion and bewilderment are wrought from a mind not sure of what it hears and this is not good. The word of God says, “For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who by their unrighteousness suppress the truth. For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them. For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature have been clearly perceived ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse. For although they knew God, they did not honor him as God or give thanks to him, but they became futile in their thinking, and their foolish hearts were darkened.  Claiming to be wise, they became fools” (Romans 1:18-23 ESV). Darwin says, “The fact that many false religions have spread over large portions of the earth like wild-fire had some weight on me. Beautiful as is the morality of the New Testament, it can hardly be denied that its perfection depends in part on the interpretation which we now put on metaphors and allegories.” (Darwin, C., 1809-1882, Para 2).

Deep down in his heart of hearts man knows that  God does exist, because he sees what God has made through nature; only a fool will deny the presence and existence of an Ultimate Being. It is obvious that the only God which requires honesty, righteousness, and encourages good is the one most hated. Hatred from whence did it come? Most certainly hatred is not good for anyone; neither the bearer of it nor the one who receives it. Surely, man cannot be good without God who made him.

Charles Darwin in his autobiography said, “By further reflecting that the clearest evidence would be requisite to make any sane man believe in the miracles by which Christianity is supported, — that the more we know of the fixed laws of nature the more incredible do miracles become, — that the men at that time were ignorant and credulous to a degree almost incomprehensible by us, — that the Gospels cannot be proved to have been written simultaneous with the events, — that they differ in many important details, far too important as it seemed to me to be admitted as the usual inaccuracies of eyewitnesses; — by such reflections as these, which I give not as having the least noveltry or value, but as they influenced me, I gradually came to disbelieve in Christianity as a divine revelation.” (Darwin, C., 1809-1882, Para 2).

Man thinks too much, and tries to figure things out too much; because the word of God requires belief in God to work. “For the law made nothing perfect, and a better hope is introduced, by which we draw near to God.” (Hebrews 7:19). Therefore, faith in God is not contingent on what is seen, but rather that which is hoped for. Only a fool says in his heart says that there is no God…Cohen writes, “Christianity is what is coined a “revealed” religion. That is, God himself revealed that religion to man. In other religions man sought God—some god—and eventually found him, or thought he did. In the case of Christianity God sought man and revealed himself to him. The revelation judging by after events was not very well done; for although a book made its appearance that was said to have been dictated or inspired by God so that man might know his will, yet ever since mankind has been in some doubt as to what God meant when he said it. Evidently, God’s way of making himself known by a revelation is not above criticism, there seems a want of sense in giving man a revelation he could not understand. It is like lecturing in Greek to an audience who understands nothing but Dutch.” (Cohen, C., 1868 – 1954, Para. 1).

In his book “The origin of Species” concerning…Natural selection…Darwin’s discovery of creatures regenerating themselves dispels God from creation, and also gives those who say that the world is good without Him their so-called ammunition. Look at this: “Darwin’s great gift to science was to show how an explanation could be given for what had been described as the mystery of mysteries, the successive appearance of new species discernible in the fossil record. If new species could emerge from pre-existing species by a process of natural selection, it was no longer necessary to suppose there had been what Darwin called independent acts of creation. For atheists and scientific materialists the plausibility of Darwin’s theory was a particularly welcome gift because it could be used to dispel the notion of divine intervention in nature and to challenge the long-cherished belief that each species had been separately and meticulously designed by its Creator.”(Brooke, J. H., 2009, Para 1). Man thinks too much, and while “…Claiming to be wise, they became fools”(Romans 1:23, ESV).


In conclusion, the book of Genesis also gives an account of the inner workings of creation by God and how He did so in just six days, and although to the natural more carnal eye of man this does seem incredible why doesn’t man have the ability to explain how creation took place or what entity allowed it other than God? The bible says that God created man in his image which is obviously a good image, because man sees himself as good; but the word declares that because of a sinful act by the man and woman sin entered the human race; thus an imperfect man exists today. (Genesis 1:1-31). Sexual lusts, hate, thieves, adulterers, robbers, murders and suffering such as poverty sometimes to an extreme degree, and with much more the suffering being a result of a disobedient heart as seen on the streets of life throughout the world.  In homes, and on jobs unrighteousness, and a critical lack of goodness is evident presenting a particular challenge as to whether or not man can be good without God who made him to be good like Him. Is it wrong to murder because God says so, or as man deems necessary as/like in capital punishment is killing anyone good? Clark states, “But it does not follow that “being wrong “means only forbidden by God. That God forbids us to murder is for an excellent reason for not doing so: that is why it is wrong for us…” (Clark, Stephen R. L., 1982,pp. 340,  Para. 4). The word of God says, “For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the LORD.” (Isaiah 55:8). Surely, it is correct to assume that God’s plan, and his ways are good; man cannot be good without Him. We have come around full circle, and it is here we note once more that “…the fool, the morally deficient being says in his heart, “There is no God.” They are corrupt, their deeds are vile; there is no one who does good.” (Psalms 14:1, NIV). No, there is not even one in the whole world.



See More Stories:

‘Good Without God’ Atheism Ads Posted On Fort Worth, Texas Buses

Atheist Media Blog


Brooke, J. H., 2009.  Charles Darwin on Religion.

Cohen, C., (1868 – 1954 ). Morality without God.

Clark, Stephen R. L., (1982). GOD’S LAW AND MORALITY.

Darwin, C., (1809-1882).  Autobiography of Charles Darwin

Nielson, K. (1982). God and the Basis of Morality.  Journal of Religious Ethics